Stanford Root

Schedule

Stanford Root

Schedule

PHIL 374D

Contractualism

UNITS:2-4
GRADING:Letter or Credit/No Credit
LEVEL:Graduate
GER:—

Perhaps the most prominent alternative to consequentialism today is contractualism, the theory that an act is wrong when it's forbidden by a principle that no one could reasonably reject. This seminar will offer a graduate-level introduction to contractualism and explore some of the many contemporary debates surrounding the theory. What does it mean for a principle to be one that "no one could reasonably reject?" Does the idea of "reasonable rejection" smuggle in a prior notion of moral wrongness, or collapse into consequentialist-style aggregation? Should contractualists really focus on principles rather than individual acts? And is contractualism (just) a theory of right and wrong, or is it something more - a theory of "what we owe to each other"? Our investigation of questions like these will lead us not only to intervene in ongoing debates about contractualism, but also to confront several important issues in contemporary moral theory more broadly. 2 unit option only for Philosophy PhDs beyond the second year.

Syllabus for selected term:
View Autumn 2026 Syllabus

Sections

1 Term
Seminar 1Open
ID: 26738
0 / 20 enrolled
DAYS:Thursday
TIME:3 PM – 5:50 PM
LOCATION:50-52H
INSTRUCTOR:
Webber, Daniel
units

PHIL 374D: Contractualism

2-4 units · Letter or Credit/No Credit

Perhaps the most prominent alternative to consequentialism today is contractualism, the theory that an act is wrong when it's forbidden by a principle that no one could reasonably reject. This seminar will offer a graduate-level introduction to contractualism and explore some of the many contemporary debates surrounding the theory. What does it mean for a principle to be one that "no one could reasonably reject?" Does the idea of "reasonable rejection" smuggle in a prior notion of moral wrongness, or collapse into consequentialist-style aggregation? Should contractualists really focus on principles rather than individual acts? And is contractualism (just) a theory of right and wrong, or is it something more - a theory of "what we owe to each other"? Our investigation of questions like these will lead us not only to intervene in ongoing debates about contractualism, but also to confront several important issues in contemporary moral theory more broadly. 2 unit option only for Philosophy PhDs beyond the second year.

Offered in Autumn 2026 at Stanford University.

Autumn 2026 sections

  • Seminar — Thursday 3:00 PM – 5:50 PM — 50-52H — Webber, Daniel (Graduate)

More PHIL courses

  • PHIL 365: Seminar in Philosophy of Physics
  • PHIL 366C: Philosophy of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence
  • PHIL 367C: Explanation in Cognitive Science
  • PHIL 370E: Adventures in Non-Consequentialist Ethics
  • PHIL 370W: Value and Consequences
  • PHIL 371A: Relational Morality
  • PHIL 375L: Pluralism in Theory, Practice, and Law
  • PHIL 375W: Self-Determination
  • PHIL 381: PhD Seminar: Topics in the Philosophy of Language
  • PHIL 382: Preservation Ethics
  • PHIL 382N: Grad Seminar
  • PHIL 383: Advanced Topics in Epistemology

All PHIL courses · All departments